by [DRuG]NikT on Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:53 pm
Flogdong:
The most concise answer to this is, "energy doesn't die, it mutates"...
If you watch a documentary called "Crude", it explains why governments worldwide are reconsidering oil as a suitable solution for power - it isn't just that we're running out - it's been discovered that oil, itself, was stored away during an ice age, where everything on the planet died, as a result of an overbalance of carbon in the air... this carbon eventually settled to the seafloor, compressing into crude oil, stored away carbon - when this cycle was complete, the temperature on the planet was able to level, with life returning to the planet... with a balanced CO2 (carbon) level.
What this taught us, was when the planet stores something away, its for a fucking serious reason... the planet couldn't go on the way it was unless balance was restored.
Here's the classic clincher...
Yellow cake, the source of nuclear power, is a product similar to oil, but yellow. Like crude oil, it is also found buried deep in the earth, storing away radioactive energy... almost like the earth has pushed it down there.
Now, we already know that using it produces nasty radioactive waste, stuff we have no way of disposing of, nor do we understand fully it's nature, or effect, should too much of it be released into the environment again.
Given oil requires an ice age, in order to store all this released carbon back into oil at the base of the (then dead) oceans, doesn't that make you question what, exactly, is required to right the imbalances raised by something like nuclear waste?
I know I, for one, want to learn from the first mistake before making an even bigger one to try and get away from it.
![](http://nikt.zog.net.au/nocleanfeed.jpg)
"But my head's all messed up, so you better driive brother"